“Global warming is here. I’m sure of it,” said the 20-year veteran of Germany’s highest mountain. “There used to be years up here when we got ten or twelve meters of snow. Last year, we got two. Every year, ice is melting away. I think we have to live with it.”
But that doesn’t mean giving up. Every summer, Huber and his workers cover some 12,000 square meters of Zugspitze’s glacier with protective tarps which reflect the sun’s heat, thereby slowing the glacier’s recession.
Similarly, Germany is acting to combat climate change and adapting to its effects. Passing an energy tax to finance the production of solar energy facilities and approving a cap-and-trade system of reducing factory emissions, the nation has taken steps towards reducing its carbon footprint that other G-8 nations like the United States have so far refused to match.
“Maybe this shows a little bit of the German character. We are trying to do something,” said Dr. Ludwig Ries of the Federal Environment Agency, who supervises an atmospheric study facility near Zugspitze’s summit. Like other monitoring stations around the world, the mountainside base has measured carbon dioxide levels increasing at a rate scientists consider dangerous to the global climate.
“There is a considerable number of people in Germany who are aware the environment is warming,” Ries said. “They are aware of the world we are giving back to our children. They are also aware we live in a way that we can’t continue to live. Germany is one of the biggest producers of carbon dioxide in Europe.”
More efficient power plants and buildings, increased investment in renewable energy sources such as wind, and calculating automobile taxes based on carbon dioxide emissions were among Germany’s additional measures passed in 2007, with more slated to follow in 2008.
“I think that the effectiveness in German policy lies in the combination of these different measures,” said Enrico Brandt of the German Embassy in Washington, DC.
The investment isn’t cheap: 3.3 billion Euros (about $4.8 billion) in 2008 alone. There are indirect costs as well; for example, Germans have paid through higher beer prices as farmers turn away from barley in favor of corn to make ethanol. The price for an Oktoberfest liter climbed above $10 last year. But the results are encouraging: through 2006, Germany’s greenhouse gas emissions fell 18 percent from the base year of 1990.
“Germany’s economy is going well, which has helped make it possible to do this,” Brandt said. “For the middle- and long-term economy, there will be a huge benefit. Germany is a leader in energy technology and savings, and we want to keep that leadership.”
While Chancellor Angela Merkel has delivered on her pledge to address the issue, persuading other nations to warm up to the fight is another challenge entirely. In particular, the German leader has tried to sway the United States. The world’s largest emitter of carbon dioxide disappointed environmentalists by failing to ratify the 1997 Kyoto global warming treaty, citing its economic cost.
“Germany’s position is that it would be only natural if the United States would take up a leading role in climate change policy,” said Brandt. “That would be a huge step forward, and the farther the US will go, the better it would be.”
At the 2007 G8 summit in Germany, President George W. Bush joined national leaders in a resolution acknowledging the problem and pledging to attempt a 50 percent carbon dioxide emissions reduction by 2050.
The president’s step did not satisfy American critics such as Al Gore, the former vice president and Nobel Prize winner who’s accused the White House of “dilly-dallying” on global warming and even censoring scientific reports on the subject. Similarly, some German critics are so frustrated with the White House that they are already counting the days until a new administration occupies it.
“The world community must not be held hostage by President Bush or other indignant ones,” declared Gerhard Timm, the managing director of Bund, a national environmental group known in English as Friends of the Earth. “Every lost year will lead to more dramatic natural catastrophes.”
However, the State Department maintains that the two nations largely agree on climate change, and they are actually moving closer together in their positions on the issue.
“I would say that the US and Germany share a common goal to reduce greenhouse gas emissions significantly,” said David Tessler of the State Department’s European bureau. “President Bush has said numerous times that he sees climate change as a serious problem that we have to address together.”
While some have faulted the US government for relying on voluntary action rather than binding measures to limit emissions, Tessler cited the 2007 energy bill that Congress passed and Bush signed, requiring an average automobile fuel efficiency of 35 miles per gallon by 2020. “That’s a binding target in the transportation sector, an area where we are taking the lead,” he said.
Germany and the United States joined some 180 nations at the United Nations climate change conference in Bali last December, where delegates agreed on a framework to negotiate emissions reductions over the next two years.
“The most significant success of the Bali Roadmap is that, for the first time, we in the developed world have brought the developing world into a framework for negotiating ongoing greenhouse gas reductions. That’s very, very important,” said Tessler. “We can’t do it alone, and we shouldn’t do it alone.” Developing nations include China and India, home of rapidly growing economies and skyrocketing air pollution figures.
To Germany, “Bali went not so far as we had hoped, but farther than we expected,” said Brandt. The nation had wanted an agreement on more decisive international measures to actually begin the hard work of reducing emissions, but even without such a deal, Germany intends to continue its effort within the European Union and with strategic partners including American states.
For example, German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier traveled to California last year to meet Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, the Austrian-born and German-speaking leader who’s championed environmental causes during his five years in office. Under Schwarzenegger, California became the first state to cap greenhouse gas emissions, and sued the federal Environmental Protection Agency for blocking the effort.
“Where climate protection and a sustainable energy policy is concerned, we agree almost seamlessly,” said Steinmeier, while Schwarzenegger praised Germany for its “great leadership when it comes to protecting the environment.” The two agreed to pursue a plan to link cap-and-trade emissions systems.
If the world’s leading scientists are right, many such steps will be needed to ward off the most ominous consequences of global warming. In a definitive 2007 report years in the making, hundreds of scientists from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change concluded that burning of fossil fuels could cause a worldwide average temperature increase of 11 degrees Fahrenheit by 2100. If unchecked, they warned, the effect could lead to famines, hurricanes, proliferation of diseases, droughts affecting up to 2 billion people, and extinction for up to 30 percent of the world’s species.
“We are now all too aware of the dramatic consequences of climate change,” said Merkel at the 2007 World Economic Forum in Switzerland. “We only have to look around Europe, starting in Germany. Our children born today won’t see any ice on the Zugspitze in 2020.”
The master of the mountain’s ski slopes knows that. Covering the glacier buys time, but every fall when Huber and his crew pull up their tarps, they find less snow to accommodate winter skiers than the year before. Where there was once 3 million square meters of ice coverage, now there is less than 500,000. Zugspitze, beautiful and picturesque, holds a special place in the hearts of Germans, but Huber believes it’s only a matter of time before the nation’s highest ski lifts shut down forever.
“Everything is getting warmer and melting away. I can’t stop it,” Huber said. “The only thing that makes me sad is that my children, and the children of my children, probably won’t get to see the glacier in 20 years anymore. They won’t be able to see the work that we did.”
German Life, 2008